Which companies are eligible for government funding – and which are not? A crucial factor in answering this question is the status "companies in distress" (CiD). This status determines not just access to rescue aid but also impacts numerous regulatory programs. For innovative growth companies, the current definition may be problematic: Businesses reporting losses in their startup phase are often considered ineligible for funding – even though their business model is viable. The German Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DIHK) advocates for a clearer, more practical distinction that does not equate startup losses with genuine financial crisis.
Context
On 24 July 2026, the EU Commission launched a public consultation on new guidelines for rescue and restructuring state aid. The basis for this is the European state aid prohibition: Government support is only permissible if it does not conflict with common interests of the Union. The guidelines detail the conditions under which rescue and restructuring aid may be granted by way of exception. Essential for this is the classification as "companies in distress" (CiD) – a term also embedded in the General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER), and hence determining eligibility for many other programs.
Under prevailing regulations, a business is defined as "in distress" if it is on the verge of insolvency – for example, if more than half of its equity has been eroded by losses. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are currently exempted from this in the initial three years of their existence. The new draft from the Commission introduces an additional exemption for qualified innovative startups for the first five years. The business sector advocates for a uniform and legally solid CiD definition across all state aid frameworks, combined with a broader substantive and temporal expansion of exemptions, as well as recognition of mezzanine capital when assessing the CiD status.
The Essentials at a Glance
- The definition of "undertaking in difficulty" used in the EU Guidelines for Rescue and Restructuring Aid only applies when companies are on the brink of insolvency – state aid often comes too late in these cases.
- At the same time, the same definition excludes innovative start-ups and scale-ups with investment-related initial losses from many funding programmes, even though their business models are fundamentally viable.
- The planned exception for innovative start-ups (five years) is a step in the right direction, but it is insufficient in the German Chamber of Commerce and Industry's (DIHK's) view.
- The UiS definition not only applies to rescue aid but is relevant for the entire EU state aid law – an inconsistent regulation creates legal uncertainty for companies.
- Hybrid financing instruments (mezzanine capital) should be considered in evaluations if they indeed fulfil an equity function.
Business Demands
- Uniform CiD definition across state aid frameworks: The definition, including its exemptions for founders, startups, and scale-ups, should be uniformly embedded in all relevant EU state aid regulations – including the GBER – to ensure legal certainty and coherence.
- Extension of exemptions to scale-ups: The proposed special rule for innovative startups should also cover innovative scale-ups, as they are in comparable growth and investment phases.
- Prolongation of exemption periods: The exemption for innovative startups and scale-ups should be extended to ten years after registration; the current SME exemption should be prolonged from three to five years.
- Clear boundary criteria for growth companies: Clear and easily verifiable innovation criteria should ensure that regular development and scaling phases – especially in deep tech, biotech, and climate tech – are not mistakenly assessed as corporate crises.
- Legally secure arrangements for conversions and spin-offs: The commencement of exemption periods should be clearly defined to minimize uncertainties in conversions, spin-offs, and changes in legal form.
- Appropriate consideration for mezzanine capital: Hybrid financing instruments should be recognized in the CiD assessment if they effectively serve as equity capital, are continuously involved in losses, and do not impose obligatory repayment conditions.
FAQ
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
What does 'enterprise in difficulties' mean under EU state aid law?
An 'enterprise in difficulties' is a business that, without state support, would cease its operations in the short or medium term – for instance, because more than half of its equity has been consumed by losses or it is facing bankruptcy proceedings. This classification has significant consequences: while it opens access to rescue aid, it also excludes many other support programmes.
Why is this particularly problematic for start-ups and scale-ups?
Many innovative growth businesses deliberately record losses in their initial years – as they heavily invest to access international markets. By the current definition, they may be classified as 'enterprises in difficulties', even if their business model is fundamentally sound. This might lead to exclusion from funding programmes designed specifically for such companies.
What is mezzanine capital, and why does it play a role in the statement?
Mezzanine capital refers to hybrid financing instruments that combine elements of equity and debt capital – such as silent partnerships or convertible loans. If these instruments truly absorb losses like genuine equity, the German Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DIHK) believes they should be considered when assessing whether a company is 'in difficulties'. The Commission outlines this approach in its new draft – which the DIHK regards as reasonable.
Why does the DIHK call for a unified definition in all state aid regulations?
Currently, there are differing definitions in the rescue guidelines and the General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER), which may lead to contradictions and legal uncertainties in practice. A unified definition, with clearly integrated exceptions for start-ups, scale-ups, and SMEs, would significantly simplify the application of the law for businesses, authorities, and courts.
Which industries are particularly affected?
Capital-intensive technology sectors like Deep Tech, Biotechnology, and Climate Tech are most affected. These companies often undergo years of development, regulatory approval, and market introduction phases before generating sustainable revenues. Hence, they rely heavily on reliable access to funding programmes.
Download
The DIHK statement dated 4 September 2026 can be accessed here:
- Download
-
DIHK-Stellungnahme zum Kommissionsentwurf für Leitlinien für staatliche Beihilfen zur Rettung und Umstrukturierung nichtfinanzieller Unternehmen in Schwierigkeiten
In ihrer Stellungnahme vom 4. September 2026 mahnt die DIHK eine praxisnähere Definition des Begriffs "Unternehmen in Schwierigkeiten" an, die weit über den Zugang zu Rettungsbeihilfen hinaus Bedeutung hat
- Information
-
File format: PDF (accessible)
File size: 136 KB
Status of: September 2026
Page count: 6 pages
(only available in German).
- Relevant in topic:
- Economic and Fiscal Policy
- Key areas:
-
- Financing
It has been translated with the assistance of AI.
No guarantee is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the translation.
Released 04.09.2026
Modified 09.09.2026
Contact
Julian Kulaga
Director Consumer Law and Intellectual Property Law